INCE vs. CNEQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and CNEQ (Alger Concentrated Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while CNEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INCE returned 26.00% vs 29.37% for CNEQ. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CNEQ.

Performance

INCE vs. CNEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with INCE having a 14.91% return and CNEQ slightly lower at 14.63%.

INCE

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 7.74%
• YTD: 14.91%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.06%

CNEQ

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 15.95%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 1Y: 29.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	$6.99M	$6.30M	$7.86M
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	$621.36K	$657.47K	$945.62K

INCE vs. CNEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	14.91%	15.92%	7.03%
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	14.63%	33.61%	29.82%

Correlation

The correlation between INCE and CNEQ is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2024	0.30

The correlation between INCE and CNEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INCE vs. CNEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCE	CNEQ
Financial Services	13.3%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	9.3%	-
Industrials	8.9%	14.5%
Healthcare	7.0%	4.7%
Utilities	6.8%	3.2%
Energy	5.6%	-
Technology	3.6%	47.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	10.9%
Basic Materials	2.7%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	17.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

INCE vs. CNEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INCE

INCE Risk / Return Rank: 96
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CNEQ

CNEQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
CNEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CNEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CNEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CNEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CNEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INCE vs. CNEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INCE	CNEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	1.16	+1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.48	1.68	+2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.21	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.24	1.53	+3.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.20	4.47	+15.72

INCE vs. CNEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCE Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the CNEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCE and CNEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INCE vs. CNEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, which is greater than CNEQ's maximum drawdown of -27.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and CNEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCE	CNEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.95%	-27.58%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.90%	-19.30%	+14.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-5.79%	+5.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-4.92%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	6.58%	-5.31%

Volatility

INCE vs. CNEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.46%, while Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCE	CNEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	9.31%	-6.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.15%	20.43%	-14.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.40%	25.44%	-17.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.25%	27.16%	-13.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	27.16%	-11.56%

INCE vs. CNEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CNEQ's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCE vs. CNEQ - Dividend Comparison

INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than CNEQ's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	0.46%	0.52%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	4.84%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCE and CNEQ in my portfolio?

INCE and CNEQ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCE or CNEQ?

CNEQ has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to INCE (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs CNEQ's -27.58%.

Which ETF is better, INCE or CNEQ?

On 1-year performance, CNEQ leads with 29.37% vs 26.00% for INCE. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCE or CNEQ?

Over the 1-year period, CNEQ has performed better with a 29.37% return vs 26.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCE or CNEQ?

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CNEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCE or CNEQ?

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 0.46% for CNEQ.

What is the main difference between INCE and CNEQ?

INCE is categorized as Dividend, while CNEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.55% for CNEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.