IMVP vs. PPA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IMVP (Invesco India ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMVP is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMVP returned 8.91%/yr vs 17.74%/yr for PPA. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMVP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.

Performance

IMVP vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -14.10% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IMVP has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 8.91%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.

IMVP

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: -14.10%
• 6M: -14.07%
• 1Y: -15.51%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: 3.16%
• 10Y*: 8.91%

PPA

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 6.95%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 28.61%
• 5Y*: 18.19%
• 10Y*: 17.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMVP vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMVP Invesco India ETF	-14.10%	1.30%	9.07%	22.82%	-9.35%	23.68%	18.41%	14.26%	-7.55%	38.51%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	9.32%	37.15%	25.28%	18.41%	9.52%	7.09%	0.45%	39.63%	-7.51%	30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IMVP and PPA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2008	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between IMVP and PPA has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IMVP vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMVP

IMVP Risk / Return Rank: 2
IMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

PPA

PPA Risk / Return Rank: 39
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMVP vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMVP	PPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.95	1.29	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	1.95	-3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.22	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	1.90	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	5.24	-6.77

IMVP vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMVP Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMVP and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMVP vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and PPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMVP	PPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.54%	-57.37%	-7.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.44%	-13.71%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.80%	-15.24%	-10.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.80%	-18.37%	-7.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.69%	-43.92%	+4.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.91%	-7.74%	-14.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.72%	-9.18%	-7.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.11%	4.95%	+5.16%

Volatility

IMVP vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is 5.44%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that IMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMVP	PPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	8.30%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.46%	16.96%	-2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.45%	20.14%	-3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	18.70%	-2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.53%	20.73%	-1.20%

IMVP vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMVP vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than PPA's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMVP Invesco India ETF	11.73%	7.39%	8.48%	2.08%	14.07%	6.95%	0.72%	36.35%	0.96%	1.01%	1.18%	0.61%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.37%	0.42%	0.61%	0.67%	0.83%	0.59%	0.88%	0.95%	0.90%	0.67%	1.70%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMVP and PPA in my portfolio?

IMVP and PPA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMVP or PPA?

PPA has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to IMVP (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVP dropped -64.54% vs PPA's -57.37%.

Which ETF is better, IMVP or PPA?

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.74% vs 8.91% for IMVP. On fees, PPA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, IMVP has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMVP or PPA?

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 8.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMVP or PPA?

PPA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMVP or PPA?

IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 0.37% for PPA.

What is the main difference between IMVP and PPA?

IMVP is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.58% for PPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.