IMVP vs. JPEM
IMVP (Invesco India ETF) and JPEM (J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IMVP tracks the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index while JPEM tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMVP returned 8.19%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for JPEM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMVP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for JPEM.
Performance
IMVP vs. JPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -16.08% return, which is significantly lower than JPEM's 7.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMVP having a 8.19% annualized return and JPEM not far behind at 8.07%.
IMVP
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- -16.08%
- 6M
- -14.80%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
JPEM
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
IMVP vs. JPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | -16.08% | 1.30% | 9.07% | 22.82% | -9.35% | 23.68% | 18.41% | 14.26% | -7.55% | 38.51% |
JPEM J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 7.19% | 22.90% | 4.23% | 11.01% | -9.03% | 8.11% | -0.46% | 16.21% | -10.55% | 28.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMVP and JPEM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2015 | 0.61 |
The correlation between IMVP and JPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMVP vs. JPEM — Risk / Return Rank
IMVP
JPEM
IMVP vs. JPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMVP | JPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.32 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 2.17 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 8.14 | -9.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMVP | JPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 1.73 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.45 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.33 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IMVP vs. JPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than JPEM's maximum drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and JPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMVP | JPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.54% | -40.22% | -24.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.44% | -10.32% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.80% | -14.30% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -21.57% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -40.22% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.71% | -3.08% | -20.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -9.47% | -7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.16% | 2.75% | +6.41% |
Volatility
IMVP vs. JPEM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco India ETF (IMVP) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) at 4.59%. This indicates that IMVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMVP | JPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 4.59% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 11.23% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 12.96% | +3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 13.49% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 17.04% | +2.55% |
IMVP vs. JPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than JPEM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMVP vs. JPEM - Dividend Comparison
IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than JPEM's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.48% | 2.08% | 14.07% | 6.95% | 0.72% | 36.35% | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.18% | 0.61% |
JPEM J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 4.40% | 4.65% | 5.12% | 4.46% | 4.71% | 4.40% | 2.85% | 3.47% | 2.79% | 2.14% | 1.28% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMVP and JPEM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMVP has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to JPEM (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVP dropped -64.54% vs JPEM's -40.22%.
On 10-year performance, IMVP leads with 8.19% vs 8.07% for JPEM. On fees, JPEM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IMVP has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPEM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.
IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 4.40% for JPEM.
IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while JPEM tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.44% for JPEM.
JPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMVP and JPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer