IMVP vs. EMCR
IMVP (Invesco India ETF) and EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IMVP tracks the FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index while EMCR tracks the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMVP returned 3.04%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for EMCR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMVP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCR.
Performance
IMVP vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMVP achieves a -14.82% return, which is significantly lower than EMCR's 18.98% return.
IMVP
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -14.82%
- 6M
- -15.38%
- 1Y
- -15.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
EMCR
- 1D
- -5.03%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 41.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- —
IMVP vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMVP Invesco India ETF | -14.82% | 1.30% | 9.07% | 22.82% | -9.35% | 23.68% | 18.41% | 14.26% | 1.99% |
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 18.98% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 22.41% | -2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMVP and EMCR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IMVP and EMCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMVP vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank
IMVP
EMCR
IMVP vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMVP | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.36 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.00 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 11.00 | -12.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMVP vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMVP drawdown since its inception was -64.54%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMVP and EMCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMVP | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.54% | -34.28% | -30.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.44% | -13.84% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.80% | -18.38% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -34.28% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.56% | -5.03% | -17.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -9.29% | -7.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.05% | 3.77% | +6.28% |
Volatility
IMVP vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is 5.38%, while Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that IMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMVP | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 11.58% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 19.77% | -5.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 21.97% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 19.82% | -3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 20.14% | -0.60% |
IMVP vs. EMCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMVP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMVP vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison
IMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.83%, more than EMCR's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.47% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMVP Invesco India ETF | 11.83% | 7.39% | 8.48% | 2.08% | 14.07% | 6.95% | 0.72% | 36.35% | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.18% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMVP and EMCR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCR has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to IMVP (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMVP dropped -64.54% vs EMCR's -34.28%.
On 5-year performance, EMCR leads with 8.45% vs 3.04% for IMVP. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IMVP has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMCR has performed better with a 8.45% return vs 3.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IMVP.
IMVP has the higher dividend yield at 11.83%, compared with 1.47% for EMCR.
IMVP tracks FTSE India Quality and Yield Select Index, while EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IMVP and 0.15% for EMCR.
EMCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMVP and EMCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer