IMV.L vs. IGLN.L
IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) and IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IMV.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L returned 7.68%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for IGLN.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMV.L is traded in GBp, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMV.L achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L has underperformed IGLN.L with an annualized return of 7.68%, while IGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.
IMV.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.55%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 27.94%
- 5Y*
- 19.72%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 4.72% | 17.66% | 6.63% | 8.56% | -7.83% | 13.68% | 1.50% | 16.37% | -2.91% | 13.29% |
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 4.12% | 53.17% | 28.35% | 7.77% | 11.79% | -3.12% | 20.51% | 13.78% | 4.54% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMV.L and IGLN.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMV.L
IGLN.L
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMV.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.86 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 4.95 | -2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMV.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.35 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.17 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.87 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.52 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -41.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and IGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMV.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -41.86% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -17.53% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.50% | -17.53% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.42% | -17.53% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.48% | -22.37% | -2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -16.35% | +11.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -14.94% | +11.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 6.59% | -3.76% |
Volatility
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) is 2.89%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that IMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMV.L | IGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 5.98% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 21.12% | -13.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 24.08% | -14.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 16.81% | -5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 16.35% | -4.04% |
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IMV.L and IGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMV.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMV.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMV.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMV.L and IGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IMV.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.
Find the right allocation for IMV.L and IGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer