IMV.L vs. CMU.L
IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - IMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L returned 7.68%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMV.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMV.L achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IMV.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 7.68%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.
IMV.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 4.72% | 17.66% | 6.63% | 8.56% | -7.83% | 13.68% | 1.50% | 16.37% | -2.91% | 13.29% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -11.56% | 17.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMV.L and CMU.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2013 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IMV.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMV.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
IMV.L
CMU.L
Industrials
IMV.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
IMV.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
IMV.L
CMU.L
Utilities
IMV.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
IMV.L
CMU.L
Energy
IMV.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
IMV.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
IMV.L
CMU.L
Technology
IMV.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
IMV.L
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMV.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMV.L
CMU.L
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMV.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.37 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 2.58 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 9.67 | -6.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMV.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.98 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.66 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.65 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.49 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMV.L drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMV.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMV.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -32.53% | +8.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -11.43% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.50% | -11.95% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.42% | -21.11% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.48% | -31.41% | +6.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -0.18% | -4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -5.80% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 3.05% | -0.22% |
Volatility
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) is 2.89%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that IMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMV.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 5.34% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 12.44% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.13% | 14.86% | -5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 16.00% | -5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.31% | 16.78% | -4.47% |
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMV.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMV.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMV.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.
IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IMV.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for IMV.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer