IMTM vs. IQLT
IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMTM returned 10.44%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for IQLT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
IMTM vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than IQLT's 9.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMTM having a 10.44% annualized return and IQLT not far behind at 10.17%.
IMTM
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
IMTM vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 11.53% | 34.50% | 12.17% | 13.89% | -16.81% | 3.50% | 22.17% | 24.52% | -14.31% | 25.46% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 9.81% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTM and IQLT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IMTM and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMTM vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMTM
IQLT
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IMTM
IQLT
Technology
IMTM
IQLT
Industrials
IMTM
IQLT
Energy
IMTM
IQLT
Basic Materials
IMTM
IQLT
Healthcare
IMTM
IQLT
Utilities
IMTM
IQLT
Consumer Defensive
IMTM
IQLT
Consumer Cyclical
IMTM
IQLT
Communication Services
IMTM
IQLT
Real Estate
IMTM
IQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTM vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank
IMTM
IQLT
IMTM vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMTM | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.63 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 6.18 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMTM vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum IQLT drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and IQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTM | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -32.21% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -10.38% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -13.18% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -30.24% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.66% | -32.21% | -0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.04% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -6.21% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.74% | +0.50% |
Volatility
IMTM vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) at 5.41%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTM | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 5.41% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.06% | 12.72% | +3.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 15.00% | +2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 16.55% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 17.00% | +0.63% |
IMTM vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IMTM and IQLT have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
IMTM vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison
IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than IQLT's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF | 4.22% | 4.70% | 2.93% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 0.97% | 2.13% | 2.36% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 1.56% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.12% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTM and IQLT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMTM has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to IQLT (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs IQLT's -32.21%.
On 10-year performance, IMTM leads with 10.44% vs 10.17% for IQLT. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMTM and IQLT have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 2.12% for IQLT.
IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while IQLT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net).
IMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMTM and IQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer