IMTM vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IMTM returned 24.50% vs -39.82% for IBIT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMTM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

IMTM vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMTM achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.88% return.

IMTM

• 1D: -3.05%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 24.50%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 10.18%

IBIT

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -17.81%
• YTD: -28.88%
• 6M: -28.88%
• 1Y: -39.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	11.09%	34.50%	11.24%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-28.88%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and IBIT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.33

Return for Risk

IMTM vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM

IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 41
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 47

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMTM	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	-0.90	+2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	-1.25	+3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.86	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	-0.77	+2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	-1.30	+8.88

IMTM vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMTM	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-52.11%	+19.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.85%	-52.11%	+39.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.05%	-50.47%	+47.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-16.85%	+9.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	30.58%	-27.34%

Volatility

IMTM vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) is 7.39%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that IMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMTM	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.39%	13.18%	-5.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.35%	34.64%	-18.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.19%	44.31%	-26.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	50.22%	-32.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.62%	50.22%	-32.60%

IMTM vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMTM vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	4.41%	4.70%	2.93%	2.29%	2.68%	2.51%	0.97%	2.13%	2.36%	1.92%	2.75%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMTM and IBIT in my portfolio?

IMTM and IBIT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMTM or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to IMTM (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

Which ETF is better, IMTM or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, IMTM leads with 24.50% vs -39.82% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IMTM has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMTM or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, IMTM has performed better with a 24.50% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMTM or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IMTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMTM or IBIT?

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between IMTM and IBIT?

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IMTM tracks MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.