IMTM vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IMTM (iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Momentum, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. IMTM is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IMTM returned 21.00%/yr vs 24.15%/yr for CGDV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMTM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.

Performance

IMTM vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMTM having a 11.53% return and CGDV slightly higher at 11.55%.

IMTM

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 6M: 12.83%
• 1Y: 23.79%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 10.44%

CGDV

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 11.55%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 24.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTM vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	11.53%	34.50%	12.17%	13.89%	-8.54%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	11.55%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IMTM and CGDV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.74

The correlation between IMTM and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMTM vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMTM	CGDV
Financial Services	29.6%	6.8%
Industrials	17.5%	13.2%
Technology	11.4%	34.1%
Energy	9.4%	3.8%
Basic Materials	9.3%	2.9%
Healthcare	9.0%	11.5%
Utilities	6.4%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	5.5%
Communication Services	1.9%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	10.6%
Real Estate	1.2%	1.1%

Return for Risk

IMTM vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTM

IMTM Risk / Return Rank: 44
IMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
IMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
IMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 78
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTM vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMTM	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.27	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	3.11	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.42	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.83	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.37	13.19	-5.82

IMTM vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMTM and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMTM vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTM drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTM and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMTM	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-21.82%	-10.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.85%	-9.75%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.85%	-14.28%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.98%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-3.60%	-3.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	2.09%	+1.15%

Volatility

IMTM vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 4.52%. This indicates that IMTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMTM	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	4.52%	+2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.06%	9.80%	+6.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.97%	12.13%	+5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.82%	15.57%	+2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.63%	15.57%	+2.06%

IMTM vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMTM vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

IMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMTM iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF	4.22%	4.70%	2.93%	2.29%	2.68%	2.51%	0.97%	2.13%	2.36%	1.92%	2.75%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMTM and CGDV in my portfolio?

IMTM and CGDV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMTM or CGDV?

IMTM has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to CGDV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTM dropped -32.66% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, IMTM or CGDV?

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.15% vs 21.00% for IMTM. On fees, IMTM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMTM or CGDV?

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.15% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMTM or CGDV?

IMTM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMTM or CGDV?

IMTM has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.

What is the main difference between IMTM and CGDV?

IMTM is categorized as Momentum, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IMTM and 0.33% for CGDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.