IMTG vs. MBSX
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and MBSX (Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MBSX.
Performance
IMTG vs. MBSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 7.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMTG vs. MBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -0.35% |
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and MBSX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. MBSX — Risk / Return Rank
IMTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MBSX
IMTG vs. MBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMTG | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.83 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. MBSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum MBSX drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and MBSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -27.57% | +24.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -24.14% | +23.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -6.90% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.76% | — |
Volatility
IMTG vs. MBSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 41.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72% | 54.86% | -50.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 54.52% | -49.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 54.52% | -49.80% |
IMTG vs. MBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMTG vs. MBSX - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than MBSX's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 1.28% | 0.00% |
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | 3.52% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMTG and MBSX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMTG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMTG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBSX.
MBSX has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.28% for IMTG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Regan. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.40% for MBSX.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and MBSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer