PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTG vs. JMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTG vs. JMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IMTG

1D
0.05%
1M
0.19%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JMBS

1D
0.18%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.07%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTG vs. JMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IMTG and JMBS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTG vs. JMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMTG

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMTG vs. JMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMTG vs. JMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMTGJMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.82

0.42

-1.24

Drawdowns

IMTG vs. JMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, smaller than the maximum JMBS drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and JMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTGJMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-16.68%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.48%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-3.89%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

Volatility

IMTG vs. JMBS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTGJMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.71%

4.31%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

6.49%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

5.52%

-0.81%

IMTG vs. JMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBS's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTG vs. JMBS - Dividend Comparison

IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than JMBS's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IMTG
Invesco Agency MBS ETF
0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.18%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IMTG and JMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IMTG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMTG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for JMBS.

JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 0.85% for IMTG.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.32% for JMBS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTG and JMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer