IMTG vs. EVMO
IMTG (Invesco Agency MBS ETF) and EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMTG charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EVMO.
Performance
IMTG vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IMTG
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVMO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMTG vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | -1.11% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTG and EVMO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTG vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTG | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 1.76 | -2.62 |
Drawdowns
IMTG vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, which is greater than EVMO's maximum drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and EVMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTG | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -1.89% | -0.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.91% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -0.38% | -1.03% |
Volatility
IMTG vs. EVMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTG | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 2.83% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 2.83% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 2.83% | +1.91% |
IMTG vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMTG vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison
IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than EVMO's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.07% | 1.95% |
IMTG Invesco Agency MBS ETF | 0.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IMTG and EVMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IMTG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMTG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EVMO.
EVMO has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.85% for IMTG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.45% for EVMO.
Find the right allocation for IMTG and EVMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer