PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMTG vs. ASEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMTG vs. ASEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IMTG

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.68%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASEC

1D
0.10%
1M
0.22%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMTG vs. ASEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IMTG and ASEC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMTG vs. ASEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Agency MBS ETF (IMTG) and American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMTG vs. ASEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMTG vs. ASEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, which is greater than ASEC's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTG and ASEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMTGASECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-0.46%

-2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-0.01%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-0.18%

-1.19%

Volatility

IMTG vs. ASEC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMTGASECDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

1.48%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.64%

1.48%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

1.48%

+3.16%

IMTG vs. ASEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMTG has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ASEC's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMTG vs. ASEC - Dividend Comparison

IMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than ASEC's 0.45% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMTG and ASEC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMTG is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMTG is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for ASEC.

IMTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.45% for ASEC.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for IMTG and 0.29% for ASEC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMTG and ASEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer