IMTB vs. FBND
IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. IMTB is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMTB returned 0.58%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FBND. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMTB charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
IMTB vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTB achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.61% return.
IMTB
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.57%
IMTB vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 0.14% | 8.88% | 1.94% | 6.10% | -12.75% | -1.41% | 6.25% | 8.62% | -0.45% | 4.88% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.61% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTB and FBND is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IMTB and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTB vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
IMTB
FBND
IMTB vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 1.91 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | 5.77 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.34 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.15 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.45 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
IMTB vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTB drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTB and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -17.25% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -2.66% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.80% | -5.94% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.11% | -17.25% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -1.32% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -3.35% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.88% | +0.04% |
Volatility
IMTB vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.26%. This indicates that IMTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.26% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.73% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 3.86% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 5.92% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.18% | 6.09% | -0.91% |
IMTB vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMTB vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
IMTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than FBND's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IMTB and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IMTB has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to FBND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMTB dropped -18.15% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 5-year performance, FBND leads with 0.86% vs 0.58% for IMTB. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FBND has performed better with a 0.86% return vs 0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.52% for IMTB.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMTB and 0.36% for FBND.
IMTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMTB and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer