IMTB vs. BNDP
IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - IMTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index while BNDP tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMTB charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.
Performance
IMTB vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTB achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than BNDP's 0.34% return.
IMTB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMTB vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | -0.02% | 0.36% |
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTB and BNDP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMTB vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank
IMTB
BNDP
IMTB vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMTB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.25 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
IMTB vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTB drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTB and BNDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -2.60% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -1.31% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -0.86% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility
IMTB vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMTB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 3.63% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 3.63% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.18% | 3.63% | +1.55% |
IMTB vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMTB vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison
IMTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than BNDP's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IMTB and BNDP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IMTB.
IMTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.
IMTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index, while BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMTB and 0.05% for BNDP.
Find the right allocation for IMTB and BNDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer