IMTB vs. APCB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB).
IMTB and APCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMTB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 5-10 Years Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2016. APCB is an actively managed fund by ActivePassive. It was launched on May 2, 2023.
Performance
IMTB vs. APCB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMTB vs. APCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | -0.09% | 8.88% | 1.94% | 1.80% |
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | -0.12% | 6.87% | 1.45% | 1.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMTB achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than APCB's -0.12% return.
IMTB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
APCB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMTB vs. APCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than APCB's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMTB vs. APCB — Risk / Return Rank
IMTB
APCB
IMTB vs. APCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) and ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMTB | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.01 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.41 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.66 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 5.04 | +1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMTB | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.01 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.68 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMTB and APCB is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMTB vs. APCB - Dividend Comparison
IMTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than APCB's 4.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 4.35% | 4.35% | 4.74% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IMTB vs. APCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMTB drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, which is greater than APCB's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMTB and APCB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMTB | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.15% | -6.42% | -11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.51% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -1.81% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -1.51% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.83% | +0.05% |
Volatility
IMTB vs. APCB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) at 1.48%. This indicates that IMTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMTB | APCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 1.48% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.32% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 3.89% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 4.91% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 4.91% | +0.29% |