IMSU.L vs. SPES.L
IMSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPES.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - IMSU.L is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPES.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMSU.L returned 6.03%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for SPES.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMSU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPES.L.
Performance
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMSU.L achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than SPES.L's 9.65% return.
IMSU.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- —
SPES.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.66% | 3.37% | 0.69% | 6.26% | -1.35% | 16.96% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 9.65% | 3.95% | 13.66% | 8.18% | -1.34% | 28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMSU.L and SPES.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IMSU.L and SPES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMSU.L
SPES.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
IMSU.L
SPES.L
Consumer Cyclical
IMSU.L
SPES.L
Communication Services
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Consumer Defensive
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Energy
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Financial Services
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Healthcare
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Industrials
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Real Estate
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Technology
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Utilities
IMSU.L
-
SPES.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMSU.L
SPES.L
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMSU.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.39 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.66 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 11.92 | -5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMSU.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 2.18 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.67 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.80 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMSU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than SPES.L's maximum drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSU.L and SPES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMSU.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.25% | -19.65% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -5.74% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.70% | -19.65% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -19.65% | -2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | 0.00% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -4.12% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 1.76% | +1.46% |
Volatility
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SPES.L) at 2.05%. This indicates that IMSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMSU.L | SPES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 2.05% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 6.43% | +5.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.68% | 9.61% | +5.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 13.97% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 14.70% | +3.76% |
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPES.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMSU.L vs. SPES.L - Dividend Comparison
IMSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPES.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist | 1.27% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.49% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMSU.L and SPES.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IMSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IMSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPES.L.
IMSU.L is categorized as Materials, while SPES.L is S&P 500. IMSU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPES.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IMSU.L and 0.20% for SPES.L.
Find the right allocation for IMSU.L and SPES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer