IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L).
IMSU.L and CSP1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMSU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. CSP1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both IMSU.L and CSP1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.43% | 3.37% | 0.69% | 6.26% | -1.35% | 28.63% | 16.34% | 19.09% | -10.83% | 10.05% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | -3.08% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 13.65% | 26.42% | 0.01% | 7.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMSU.L achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's -3.08% return.
IMSU.L
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 14.29%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 14.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMSU.L
CSP1.L
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.97 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.06 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 7.08 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.97 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.88 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.03 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMSU.L and CSP1.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IMSU.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMSU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMSU.L and CSP1.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.25% | -25.48% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -10.33% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -20.77% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -4.74% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -3.35% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.07% | +0.91% |
Volatility
IMSU.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 3.75%. This indicates that IMSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMSU.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 3.75% | +3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 8.30% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 15.14% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 14.38% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 15.60% | +2.92% |