PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMRX vs. DOCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMRX vs. DOCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Immuneering Corporation (IMRX) and Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMRX achieves a -30.85% return, which is significantly higher than DOCS's -52.48% return.


IMRX

1D
6.31%
1M
-15.51%
YTD
-30.85%
6M
-32.49%
1Y
132.14%
3Y*
-19.59%
5Y*
10Y*

DOCS

1D
-2.19%
1M
-15.47%
YTD
-52.48%
6M
-59.17%
1Y
-60.68%
3Y*
-13.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMRX vs. DOCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IMRX
Immuneering Corporation
-30.85%199.09%-70.07%51.55%-70.01%-8.07%
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.
-52.48%-17.06%90.41%-16.45%-33.05%-19.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IMRX and DOCS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.17

The correlation between IMRX and DOCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMRX:

$294.20M

DOCS:

$4.10B

EPS

IMRX:

-$293.00

DOCS:

$0.98

PB Ratio

IMRX:

0.00

DOCS:

4.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMRX:

$0.00

DOCS:

$644.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMRX:

-$698.89K

DOCS:

$574.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

IMRX:

-$15.38B

DOCS:

$245.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMRX vs. DOCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMRX
IMRX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DOCS
DOCS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DOCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOCS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DOCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOCS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMRX vs. DOCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immuneering Corporation (IMRX) and Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMRXDOCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

-1.12

+2.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

-1.71

+3.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.75

+0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

-0.80

+3.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.98

-1.38

+5.37

IMRX vs. DOCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the DOCS Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMRX and DOCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMRXDOCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

-1.12

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.25

+0.03

Drawdowns

IMRX vs. DOCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMRX drawdown since its inception was -96.86%, which is greater than DOCS's maximum drawdown of -82.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRX and DOCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMRXDOCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.86%

-82.35%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.35%

-76.03%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.98%

-78.34%

-12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.14%

-79.38%

-6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.60%

-57.10%

-20.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.32%

43.84%

-10.52%

Volatility

IMRX vs. DOCS - Volatility Comparison

Immuneering Corporation (IMRX) and Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) have volatilities of 32.23% and 32.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMRXDOCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.23%

32.24%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.61%

46.16%

+32.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

123.87%

54.70%

+69.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

114.62%

69.08%

+45.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.62%

69.08%

+45.54%

Dividends

IMRX vs. DOCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMRX nor DOCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IMRX vs. DOCS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immuneering Corporation and Doximity, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M202220232024202520260
145.37M
(IMRX) Total Revenue
(DOCS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IMRX and DOCS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOCS has higher volatility (32.24%) compared to IMRX (32.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMRX dropped -96.86% vs DOCS's -82.35%.

IMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMRX and DOCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer