PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMRA vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMRA vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMRA achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


IMRA

1D
0.48%
1M
-7.44%
6M
0.60%
YTD
9.09%
1Y
-36.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-22.65%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.82K$40.21K$63.26K
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

IMRA vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IMRA and SBIT is -0.62, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

-0.62

The correlation between IMRA and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMRA vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMRA
IMRA Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IMRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMRA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IMRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMRA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMRA vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMRASBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.23

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

2.35

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

5.19

-6.13

IMRA vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMRA and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMRA vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMRA drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMRA and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMRASBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-91.35%

+29.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.55%

-47.94%

-13.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.35%

-77.87%

+27.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.22%

-69.07%

+38.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.38%

21.67%

+19.71%

Volatility

IMRA vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (IMRA) is 14.05%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that IMRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMRASBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.05%

18.09%

-4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.56%

67.10%

-24.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.97%

88.65%

-28.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.81%

96.10%

-36.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.81%

96.10%

-36.29%

IMRA vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMRA has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMRA vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

IMRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.02%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IMRA
Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF
92.02%188.74%0.00%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMRA and SBIT have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to IMRA (14.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMRA dropped -61.55% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs -36.63% for IMRA. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, IMRA has been the lower-risk option at 14.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs -36.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for IMRA.

IMRA has the higher dividend yield at 92.02%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

IMRA is categorized as Derivative Income, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for IMRA and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMRA and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer