IMOM vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IMOM is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, IMOM returned 30.21% vs 116.49% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

IMOM vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 8.06% return.

IMOM

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.80%
• 6M: 3.16%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 1Y: 30.21%
• 3Y*: 22.16%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 7.02%

WNTR

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 116.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOM vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	10.71%	34.35%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	8.06%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOM and WNTR is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.37

Return for Risk

IMOM vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOM

IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 50
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOM vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMOM	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.06	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	2.34	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	2.60	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	6.69	+0.32

IMOM vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOM and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMOM vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMOM	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.74%	-42.65%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.61%	-42.65%	+27.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.51%	-11.84%	+3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.10%	-20.57%	+6.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	16.58%	-12.38%

Volatility

IMOM vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) is 7.91%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that IMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMOM	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	18.80%	-10.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.53%	47.57%	-29.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.98%	53.81%	-32.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.11%	53.62%	-33.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.21%	53.62%	-33.41%

IMOM vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMOM vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	2.28%	2.53%	4.52%	2.95%	6.06%	1.27%	0.59%	1.17%	0.78%	1.11%	0.54%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	104.11%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMOM and WNTR in my portfolio?

IMOM and WNTR have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMOM or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to IMOM (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, IMOM or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs 30.21% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IMOM has been the lower-risk option at 7.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMOM or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs 30.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMOM or WNTR?

IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMOM or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 2.28% for IMOM.

What is the main difference between IMOM and WNTR?

IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.