IMOM vs. SPVM
IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - IMOM tracks the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR) while SPVM tracks the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMOM returned 7.38%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for SPVM. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SPVM.
Performance
IMOM vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has underperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 7.38%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
IMOM
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 36.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
SPVM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
IMOM vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 13.79% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.75% | 28.39% | 18.26% | -23.07% | 34.83% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 9.93% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and SPVM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.48 |
The correlation between IMOM and SPVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IMOM vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMOM
SPVM
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
IMOM
SPVM
Technology
IMOM
SPVM
Basic Materials
IMOM
SPVM
Utilities
IMOM
SPVM
Energy
IMOM
SPVM
Communication Services
IMOM
SPVM
Financial Services
IMOM
SPVM
Real Estate
IMOM
SPVM
Healthcare
IMOM
SPVM
Consumer Cyclical
IMOM
SPVM
Consumer Defensive
IMOM
-
SPVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
SPVM
IMOM vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMOM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 4.43 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 16.80 | -7.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and SPVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -45.35% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -6.57% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -18.66% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -19.48% | -19.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | -45.35% | -0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -0.87% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.13% | -4.98% | -9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 1.73% | +2.17% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.27%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | SPVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 3.27% | +5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 7.72% | +10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 11.64% | +9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 16.74% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 19.56% | +0.72% |
IMOM vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMOM vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than SPVM's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.22% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 2.02% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMOM and SPVM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMOM has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to SPVM (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs SPVM's -45.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPVM leads with 12.34% vs 7.38% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 2.02% for SPVM.
IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMOM and SPVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer