IMOM vs. PXI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - IMOM tracks the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR) while PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMOM returned 6.99%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for PXI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PXI.

Performance

IMOM vs. PXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMOM achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 29.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IMOM has outperformed PXI with an annualized return of 6.99%, while PXI has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.

IMOM

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -6.55%
• 6M: 0.13%
• YTD: 8.67%
• 1Y: 27.81%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: 6.92%
• 10Y*: 6.99%

PXI

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 24.43%
• YTD: 29.02%
• 1Y: 33.12%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 18.42%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOM vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	8.67%	47.20%	5.22%	9.15%	-21.92%	-0.75%	28.39%	18.26%	-23.07%	34.83%
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF	29.02%	3.86%	0.76%	5.48%	45.85%	75.05%	-35.91%	1.67%	-27.56%	-8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOM and PXI is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between IMOM and PXI has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IMOM vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMOM	PXI
Industrials	31.2%	0.9%
Technology	18.7%	-
Basic Materials	14.5%	4.9%
Utilities	10.7%	-
Energy	10.3%	95.1%
Communication Services	6.3%	-
Financial Services	4.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	4.2%	-
Healthcare	3.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-

Return for Risk

IMOM vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOM

IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 47
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 49

PXI

PXI Risk / Return Rank: 55
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 49
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOM vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMOM	PXI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.49	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.01	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	2.68	-0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.56	7.29	-0.73

IMOM vs. PXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the PXI Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOM and PXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMOM vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and PXI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMOM	PXI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.74%	-85.08%	+39.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.61%	-12.40%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.51%	-30.74%	+13.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.27%	-33.47%	-5.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.74%	-79.55%	+33.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.20%	-6.01%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-29.32%	+15.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	4.56%	-0.31%

Volatility

IMOM vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) at 7.31%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMOM	PXI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.71%	7.31%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.60%	17.49%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.08%	22.36%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	33.25%	-13.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.22%	36.99%	-16.77%

IMOM vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMOM vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison

IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than PXI's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	2.33%	2.53%	4.52%	2.95%	6.06%	1.27%	0.59%	1.17%	0.78%	1.11%	0.54%	0.00%
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF	1.27%	1.81%	1.52%	1.82%	3.14%	0.57%	1.72%	2.80%	0.93%	0.80%	0.73%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMOM and PXI in my portfolio?

IMOM and PXI have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMOM or PXI?

IMOM has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to PXI (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs PXI's -85.08%.

Which ETF is better, IMOM or PXI?

On 10-year performance, IMOM leads with 6.99% vs 5.98% for PXI. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMOM or PXI?

Over the 10-year period, IMOM has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMOM or PXI?

IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMOM or PXI?

IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.27% for PXI.

What is the main difference between IMOM and PXI?

IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.60% for PXI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.