PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMOM vs. MBOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMOM vs. MBOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IMOM having a 17.37% return and MBOX slightly lower at 16.59%.


IMOM

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
17.37%
6M
21.81%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
7.87%

MBOX

1D
0.96%
1M
5.18%
YTD
16.59%
6M
16.07%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMOM vs. MBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
17.37%47.20%5.22%9.15%-21.92%-0.55%
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
16.59%8.72%16.39%15.84%-4.32%9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IMOM and MBOX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021

0.60

The correlation between IMOM and MBOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMOM vs. MBOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMOM
MBOX

Industrials

33.2%
8.2%

Basic Materials

19.4%
3.8%

Technology

15.8%
18.3%

Utilities

12.4%
2.2%

Real Estate

4.2%
3.4%

Financial Services

4.1%
25.0%

Communication Services

3.9%
2.0%

Healthcare

3.3%
13.4%

Energy

1.9%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.0%

Industrials

IMOM
33.2%
MBOX
8.2%

Basic Materials

IMOM
19.4%
MBOX
3.8%

Technology

IMOM
15.8%
MBOX
18.3%

Utilities

IMOM
12.4%
MBOX
2.2%

Real Estate

IMOM
4.2%
MBOX
3.4%

Financial Services

IMOM
4.1%
MBOX
25.0%

Communication Services

IMOM
3.9%
MBOX
2.0%

Healthcare

IMOM
3.3%
MBOX
13.4%

Energy

IMOM
1.9%
MBOX
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IMOM
1.7%
MBOX
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

IMOM

-

MBOX
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMOM vs. MBOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMOM
IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MBOX
MBOX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
MBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMOM vs. MBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMOMMBOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

4.52

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

14.98

-4.01

IMOM vs. MBOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the MBOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMOM and MBOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMOMMBOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.41

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.84

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.84

-0.45

Drawdowns

IMOM vs. MBOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than MBOX's maximum drawdown of -16.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and MBOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMOMMBOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.74%

-16.42%

-29.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.61%

-5.75%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-16.37%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.27%

-16.42%

-22.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

0.00%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

-3.46%

-10.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

1.73%

+1.97%

Volatility

IMOM vs. MBOX - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) at 3.17%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMOMMBOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

3.17%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

7.84%

+8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

10.78%

+8.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

14.50%

+5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

14.47%

+5.73%

IMOM vs. MBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MBOX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMOM vs. MBOX - Dividend Comparison

IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than MBOX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IMOM
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
2.15%2.53%4.52%2.95%6.06%1.27%0.59%1.17%0.78%1.11%0.54%
MBOX
Freedom Day Dividend ETF
1.87%1.94%1.60%2.13%2.87%1.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMOM and MBOX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMOM has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to MBOX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs MBOX's -16.42%.

On 5-year performance, MBOX leads with 12.07% vs 8.31% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MBOX has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MBOX has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MBOX.

IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.87% for MBOX.

IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while MBOX is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.39% for MBOX.

MBOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMOM and MBOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer