IMOM vs. MBOX
IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) and MBOX (Freedom Day Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR), while MBOX is a Dividend fund actively managed by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC. IMOM is passively managed, while MBOX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMOM returned 8.31%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for MBOX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMOM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MBOX.
Performance
IMOM vs. MBOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IMOM having a 17.37% return and MBOX slightly lower at 16.59%.
IMOM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 17.37%
- 6M
- 21.81%
- 1Y
- 40.53%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 7.87%
MBOX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- —
IMOM vs. MBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 17.37% | 47.20% | 5.22% | 9.15% | -21.92% | -0.55% |
MBOX Freedom Day Dividend ETF | 16.59% | 8.72% | 16.39% | 15.84% | -4.32% | 9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMOM and MBOX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IMOM and MBOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IMOM vs. MBOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMOM
MBOX
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
IMOM
MBOX
Basic Materials
IMOM
MBOX
Technology
IMOM
MBOX
Utilities
IMOM
MBOX
Real Estate
IMOM
MBOX
Financial Services
IMOM
MBOX
Communication Services
IMOM
MBOX
Healthcare
IMOM
MBOX
Energy
IMOM
MBOX
Consumer Cyclical
IMOM
MBOX
Consumer Defensive
IMOM
-
MBOX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMOM vs. MBOX — Risk / Return Rank
IMOM
MBOX
IMOM vs. MBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) and Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMOM | MBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 4.52 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 14.98 | -4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMOM | MBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.41 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.84 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.84 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
IMOM vs. MBOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMOM drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, which is greater than MBOX's maximum drawdown of -16.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMOM and MBOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMOM | MBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -16.42% | -29.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -5.75% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -16.37% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.27% | -16.42% | -22.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | 0.00% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -3.46% | -10.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 1.73% | +1.97% |
Volatility
IMOM vs. MBOX - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Freedom Day Dividend ETF (MBOX) at 3.17%. This indicates that IMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMOM | MBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 3.17% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 7.84% | +8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 10.78% | +8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 14.50% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 14.47% | +5.73% |
IMOM vs. MBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMOM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MBOX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMOM vs. MBOX - Dividend Comparison
IMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than MBOX's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.15% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
MBOX Freedom Day Dividend ETF | 1.87% | 1.94% | 1.60% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 1.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMOM and MBOX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMOM has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to MBOX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMOM dropped -45.74% vs MBOX's -16.42%.
On 5-year performance, MBOX leads with 12.07% vs 8.31% for IMOM. On fees, IMOM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MBOX has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MBOX has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMOM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MBOX.
IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.87% for MBOX.
IMOM is categorized as Momentum, while MBOX is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IMOM and 0.39% for MBOX.
MBOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMOM and MBOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer