IMLAX vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
IMLAX is managed by Transamerica. It was launched on Feb 28, 2002. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008.
Performance
IMLAX vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IMLAX vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMLAX Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund | -4.68% | 17.98% | 13.11% | 15.70% | -17.36% | 11.37% | 16.92% | 17.82% | -8.54% | 15.88% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | -2.21% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMLAX achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, IMLAX has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 7.71%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.
IMLAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
ACWI
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMLAX vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMLAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IMLAX vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IMLAX
ACWI
IMLAX vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMLAX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 1.77 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.79 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 8.26 | -2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMLAX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.68 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between IMLAX and ACWI is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IMLAX vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IMLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than ACWI's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMLAX Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund | 7.24% | 6.90% | 6.44% | 3.39% | 3.62% | 8.40% | 4.06% | 7.35% | 15.09% | 9.95% | 6.99% | 7.99% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.59% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
Drawdowns
IMLAX vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMLAX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMLAX and ACWI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMLAX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -56.00% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -11.76% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | -26.42% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.36% | -33.53% | +6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.62% | -6.92% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -8.69% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.54% | -0.51% |
Volatility
IMLAX vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Growth Portfolio Fund (IMLAX) is 4.10%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that IMLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IMLAX | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 6.38% | -2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 10.05% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 17.48% | -4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 15.97% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 17.08% | -4.98% |