IMIDX vs. NEEGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IMIDX (Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund) and NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IMIDX returned 11.58%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for NEEGX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IMIDX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for NEEGX.

Performance

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMIDX achieves a 15.91% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 34.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IMIDX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 11.58%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.

IMIDX

• 1D: 3.65%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 12.15%
• YTD: 15.91%
• 1Y: 10.69%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: 11.58%
• ALL TIME*: 12.55%

NEEGX

• 1D: 5.86%
• 1M: -10.02%
• 6M: 17.12%
• YTD: 34.50%
• 1Y: 51.33%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 14.06%
• ALL TIME*: 12.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund	15.91%	-4.88%	18.11%	16.29%	-26.94%	29.42%	30.57%	42.36%	-4.98%	15.91%
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	34.50%	8.76%	14.45%	26.85%	-33.57%	27.63%	41.73%	42.33%	-10.56%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IMIDX and NEEGX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2012	0.85

The correlation between IMIDX and NEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IMIDX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMIDX

IMIDX Risk / Return Rank: 13
IMIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
IMIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
IMIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
IMIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
IMIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

NEEGX

NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMIDX	NEEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	1.42	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.93	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.24	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.72	2.00	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.82	8.32	-6.51

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMIDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMIDX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMIDX drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, smaller than the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMIDX and NEEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMIDX	NEEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.15%	-53.60%	+18.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.10%	-23.15%	+11.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.49%	-38.66%	+15.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.88%	-43.35%	+8.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.15%	-43.35%	+8.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.49%	-18.65%	+15.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-10.88%	+3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	5.68%	-0.91%

Volatility

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) is 6.19%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that IMIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMIDX	NEEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	12.98%	-6.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.49%	26.85%	-10.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.12%	32.47%	-12.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.70%	29.42%	-7.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.21%	25.90%	-4.69%

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMIDX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMIDX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

IMIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than NEEGX's 5.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund	11.45%	13.27%	27.75%	6.27%	5.80%	12.29%	2.06%	10.80%	2.99%	0.04%	1.11%	0.80%
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	5.63%	7.57%	3.92%	0.00%	1.78%	6.92%	5.73%	11.31%	17.79%	9.70%	4.22%	6.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMIDX and NEEGX in my portfolio?

IMIDX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMIDX or NEEGX?

NEEGX has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to IMIDX (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMIDX dropped -35.15% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.