IMID.L vs. SPX5.L
IMID.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI) and SPX5.L (SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMID.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPX5.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMID.L returned 10.97%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for SPX5.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMID.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPX5.L.
Performance
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IMID.L is traded in USD, while SPX5.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SPX5.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMID.L achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than SPX5.L's 10.22% return.
IMID.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SPX5.L
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMID.L SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI | 12.31% | 22.16% | 16.31% | 21.65% | -17.64% | 17.85% | 16.14% | 25.35% | -9.90% |
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.22% | 17.59% | 25.34% | 26.07% | -18.73% | 29.78% | 17.00% | 31.82% | -6.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMID.L and SPX5.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IMID.L and SPX5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Financial Services
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Consumer Defensive
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Healthcare
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Technology
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Basic Materials
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Real Estate
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Utilities
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Communication Services
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Energy
IMID.L
SPX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
IMID.L
SPX5.L
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMID.L | SPX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 3.25 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.47 | 14.01 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMID.L | SPX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.54 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.88 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.94 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMID.L drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, which is greater than SPX5.L's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMID.L and SPX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMID.L | SPX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.56% | -33.47% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -8.64% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -18.43% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.07% | -25.18% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.54% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -3.72% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.01% | +0.10% |
Volatility
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPX5.L) at 2.47%. This indicates that IMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMID.L | SPX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 2.47% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 7.93% | +2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 11.10% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 15.55% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 16.06% | +5.17% |
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMID.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPX5.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMID.L vs. SPX5.L - Dividend Comparison
IMID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPX5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMID.L SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPX5.L SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.98% | 1.40% | 1.76% | 1.71% | 2.36% | 1.49% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMID.L and SPX5.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPX5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPX5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IMID.L.
IMID.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPX5.L is S&P 500. IMID.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPX5.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IMID.L and 0.09% for SPX5.L.
Find the right allocation for IMID.L and SPX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer