IMFL vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMFL is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IMFL is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, IMFL returned 28.76% vs 97.02% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. IMFL charges 0.34%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

IMFL vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMFL achieves a 15.49% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.46% return.

IMFL

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 15.49%
• 6M: 14.99%
• 1Y: 28.76%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.01%
• 1M: 37.47%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 97.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMFL vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	15.49%	23.05%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.46%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IMFL and WNTR is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.32

Return for Risk

IMFL vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 57
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 51
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMFL vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMFL	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.85	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.20	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	2.29	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.58	5.85	+2.74

IMFL vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMFL and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMFL vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMFL and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMFL	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.26%	-42.65%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-42.65%	+30.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.50%	-9.88%	+7.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-20.93%	+13.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	16.70%	-13.34%

Volatility

IMFL vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) is 6.66%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that IMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMFL	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	17.54%	-10.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.31%	45.99%	-31.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.76%	52.83%	-36.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	53.10%	-36.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	53.10%	-36.97%

IMFL vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMFL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMFL vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

IMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.93%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	96.66%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMFL and WNTR in my portfolio?

IMFL and WNTR have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMFL or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to IMFL (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMFL dropped -33.26% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, IMFL or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 28.76% for IMFL. On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, IMFL has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMFL or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 28.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMFL or WNTR?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMFL or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 2.93% for IMFL.

What is the main difference between IMFL and WNTR?

IMFL is categorized as Global Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for IMFL and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.