IMFL vs. PPA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMFL is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMFL returned 8.35%/yr vs 18.41%/yr for PPA. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMFL charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.

Performance

IMFL vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMFL achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 9.76% return.

IMFL

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 14.49%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 16.29%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: —

PPA

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 7.56%
• 1Y: 26.02%
• 3Y*: 28.78%
• 5Y*: 18.41%
• 10Y*: 17.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMFL vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	14.49%	30.89%	-3.57%	25.51%	-17.32%	7.00%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	9.76%	37.15%	25.28%	18.41%	9.52%	5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IMFL and PPA is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021	0.55

The correlation between IMFL and PPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMFL vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMFL	PPA
Technology	17.6%	9.2%
Industrials	17.2%	90.6%
Healthcare	11.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	11.3%	-
Financial Services	10.9%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	-
Basic Materials	5.3%	-
Energy	5.3%	-
Utilities	3.7%	-
Communication Services	3.3%	0.1%
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

IMFL vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

PPA

PPA Risk / Return Rank: 38
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMFL vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMFL	PPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.30	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	1.96	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	1.91	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	5.29	+3.53

IMFL vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMFL and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMFL vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMFL and PPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMFL	PPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.26%	-57.37%	+24.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-13.71%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.52%	-15.24%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.26%	-18.37%	-14.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.35%	-7.37%	+4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.19%	-9.18%	+1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	4.93%	-1.57%

Volatility

IMFL vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) is 6.64%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that IMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMFL	PPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	8.40%	-1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.32%	17.09%	-2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.75%	20.15%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	18.70%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	20.73%	-4.60%

IMFL vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMFL has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMFL vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

IMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than PPA's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	2.96%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.37%	0.42%	0.61%	0.67%	0.83%	0.59%	0.88%	0.95%	0.90%	0.67%	1.70%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMFL and PPA in my portfolio?

IMFL and PPA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMFL or PPA?

PPA has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to IMFL (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMFL dropped -33.26% vs PPA's -57.37%.

Which ETF is better, IMFL or PPA?

On 5-year performance, PPA leads with 18.41% vs 8.35% for IMFL. On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, IMFL has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMFL or PPA?

Over the 5-year period, PPA has performed better with a 18.41% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMFL or PPA?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMFL or PPA?

IMFL has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.37% for PPA.

What is the main difference between IMFL and PPA?

IMFL is categorized as Global Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. IMFL tracks FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for IMFL and 0.58% for PPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.