IMF vs. RSST

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IMF (Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Invesco, while RSST is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IMF returned 20.19% vs 46.58% for RSST. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RSST.

Performance

IMF vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMF achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than RSST's 13.30% return.

IMF

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.56%
• 1Y: 20.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSST

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -4.55%
• YTD: 13.30%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 46.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMF vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	11.36%	-8.17%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	13.30%	28.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IMF and RSST is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	0.51

The correlation between IMF and RSST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IMF vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMF

IMF Risk / Return Rank: 73
IMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
IMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
IMF Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IMF Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 65
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMF vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMF	RSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.98	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.39	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.34	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.65	4.00	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.14	12.94	+3.20

IMF vs. RSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the RSST Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMF and RSST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMF vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMF drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMF and RSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMF	RSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.29%	-30.80%	+15.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.59%	-11.71%	+8.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-7.59%	+4.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.30%	-6.02%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	3.61%	-2.36%

Volatility

IMF vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) is 2.58%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that IMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMF	RSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	9.44%	-6.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.20%	17.32%	-8.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	23.60%	-13.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.39%	24.50%	-12.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	24.50%	-12.11%

IMF vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMF vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

IMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than RSST's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.91%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	0.99%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMF and RSST in my portfolio?

IMF and RSST have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMF or RSST?

RSST has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to IMF (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMF dropped -15.29% vs RSST's -30.80%.

Which ETF is better, IMF or RSST?

On 1-year performance, RSST leads with 46.58% vs 20.19% for IMF. On fees, IMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMF or RSST?

Over the 1-year period, RSST has performed better with a 46.58% return vs 20.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMF or RSST?

IMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RSST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMF or RSST?

RSST has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.91% for IMF.

What is the main difference between IMF and RSST?

IMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while RSST is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IMF and 0.99% for RSST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.