PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCVX vs. TGVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCVX achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly lower than TGVOX's 19.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCVX has underperformed TGVOX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while TGVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.


IMCVX

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.39%
6M
8.76%
YTD
14.19%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
9.64%
ALL TIME*
12.15%

TGVOX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.65%
6M
12.08%
YTD
19.07%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
12.15%
ALL TIME*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCVX
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund
14.19%4.09%10.72%9.44%-11.52%29.40%2.62%40.50%-15.20%15.06%
TGVOX
TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund
19.07%15.53%17.26%15.99%-11.80%31.99%3.66%29.34%-22.17%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCVX and TGVOX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.94

The correlation between IMCVX and TGVOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCVX vs. TGVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCVX
IMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TGVOX
TGVOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TGVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TGVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) and TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVXTGVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.30

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

12.82

-4.55

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the TGVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCVX and TGVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCVX drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum TGVOX drawdown of -58.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCVX and TGVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVXTGVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-58.14%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-9.04%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-22.69%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-23.81%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-51.10%

+6.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.65%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-10.24%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.33%

-0.18%

Volatility

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund (IMCVX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) at 2.25%. This indicates that IMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVXTGVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.25%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

10.52%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

14.42%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

19.32%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.00%

22.12%

-2.12%

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCVX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than TGVOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMCVX vs. TGVOX - Dividend Comparison

IMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, less than TGVOX's 18.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCVX
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value Fund
8.07%9.21%11.72%0.98%8.69%15.71%4.38%19.23%20.04%7.09%3.00%21.05%
TGVOX
TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund
18.22%21.70%9.54%2.34%2.54%12.69%0.75%2.43%9.90%8.25%0.56%16.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCVX and TGVOX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCVX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to TGVOX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCVX dropped -44.22% vs TGVOX's -58.14%.

TGVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCVX and TGVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer