PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCG vs. VIMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly higher than VIMAX's 9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has outperformed VIMAX with an annualized return of 14.48%, while VIMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.


IMCG

1D
0.83%
1M
5.87%
YTD
18.63%
6M
17.29%
1Y
23.54%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
14.48%

VIMAX

1D
1.86%
1M
3.29%
YTD
9.37%
6M
8.26%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
18.63%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%
VIMAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
9.37%11.67%14.66%16.53%-18.70%24.51%18.18%31.03%-9.24%19.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and VIMAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004

0.93

The correlation between IMCG and VIMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCG
VIMAX

Technology

34.9%
18.6%

Industrials

25.3%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
8.6%

Financial Services

8.6%
12.8%

Healthcare

6.9%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

3.1%
5.4%

Utilities

2.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
3.1%

Energy

1.7%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
4.8%

Technology

IMCG
34.9%
VIMAX
18.6%

Industrials

IMCG
25.3%
VIMAX
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCG
9.1%
VIMAX
8.6%

Financial Services

IMCG
8.6%
VIMAX
12.8%

Healthcare

IMCG
6.9%
VIMAX
7.6%

Basic Materials

IMCG
4.3%
VIMAX
4.2%

Real Estate

IMCG
3.1%
VIMAX
5.4%

Utilities

IMCG
2.5%
VIMAX
8.3%

Communication Services

IMCG
2.4%
VIMAX
3.1%

Energy

IMCG
1.7%
VIMAX
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

IMCG
1.2%
VIMAX
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCG vs. VIMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VIMAX
VIMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VIMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VIMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCGVIMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.15

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

8.08

+0.14

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the VIMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and VIMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, roughly equal to the maximum VIMAX drawdown of -58.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and VIMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCGVIMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-58.88%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-8.13%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

-18.93%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-27.55%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

-39.30%

+4.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.40%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-8.11%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.16%

+0.50%

Volatility

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIMAX) at 4.27%. This indicates that IMCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCGVIMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

4.27%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

9.81%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

12.70%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

17.69%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

18.94%

+1.64%

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VIMAX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCG vs. VIMAX - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VIMAX's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
VIMAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.36%1.51%1.48%1.50%1.59%1.11%1.44%1.47%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IMCG and VIMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMCG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to VIMAX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs VIMAX's -58.88%.

VIMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCG and VIMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer