PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCG vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCG vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCG has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 14.46%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.79% annualized return.


IMCG

1D
-0.26%
1M
8.33%
YTD
20.05%
6M
18.28%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
14.46%

SOXX

1D
1.76%
1M
33.25%
YTD
104.57%
6M
99.43%
1Y
190.05%
3Y*
57.39%
5Y*
34.50%
10Y*
35.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
20.05%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%35.70%-3.68%25.57%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
104.57%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and SOXX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004

0.76

The correlation between IMCG and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCG vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCG
SOXX

Technology

30.4%
100.0%

Industrials

26.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Financial Services

9.1%

-

Healthcare

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.5%

-

Real Estate

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Energy

2.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.2%

-

Technology

IMCG
30.4%
SOXX
100.0%

Industrials

IMCG
26.6%
SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

IMCG
10.0%
SOXX

-

Financial Services

IMCG
9.1%
SOXX

-

Healthcare

IMCG
7.4%
SOXX

-

Basic Materials

IMCG
4.5%
SOXX

-

Real Estate

IMCG
3.4%
SOXX

-

Utilities

IMCG
2.7%
SOXX

-

Communication Services

IMCG
2.6%
SOXX

-

Energy

IMCG
2.1%
SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

IMCG
1.2%
SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCG vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMCGSOXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

5.61

-4.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

5.36

-3.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.74

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

12.13

-9.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.97

46.43

-37.46

IMCG vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 5.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMCGSOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

5.61

-4.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.96

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

1.07

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.45

+0.09

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCGSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-70.21%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-15.77%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

-41.36%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-45.75%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

-45.75%

+10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-19.97%

+10.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

4.11%

-1.50%

Volatility

IMCG vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is 4.65%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that IMCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCGSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

14.03%

-9.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

27.35%

-14.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

34.18%

-18.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

36.11%

-15.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

33.43%

-12.92%

IMCG vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMCG vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.65%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCG and SOXX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to IMCG (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.79% vs 14.46% for IMCG. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.79% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.

IMCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.

IMCG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCG and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCG and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer