IMCG vs. KMID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. IMCG is passively managed, while KMID is actively managed. Over the past year, IMCG returned 23.77% vs -0.30% for KMID. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMCG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.

Performance

IMCG vs. KMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 20.55% return, which is significantly higher than KMID's 0.87% return.

IMCG

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: 20.55%
• 6M: 18.49%
• 1Y: 23.77%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: 14.83%

KMID

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: -0.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	20.55%	6.55%	1.82%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.87%	0.31%	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and KMID is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024	0.82

The correlation between IMCG and KMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCG vs. KMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMCG	KMID
Technology	34.9%	15.8%
Industrials	25.3%	52.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	8.7%
Financial Services	8.6%	11.8%
Healthcare	6.9%	11.5%
Basic Materials	4.3%	-
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.5%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Energy	1.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

IMCG vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG

IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 45
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

KMID

KMID Risk / Return Rank: 8
KMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
KMID Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KMID Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IMCG	KMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	-0.02	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	0.08	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.01	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	-0.03	+2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	-0.07	+9.02

IMCG vs. KMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the KMID Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and KMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than KMID's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and KMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCG	KMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.96%	-18.89%	-40.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.17%	-10.71%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-6.21%	+4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.20%	-5.74%	-3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	4.36%	-1.70%

Volatility

IMCG vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) at 5.05%. This indicates that IMCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCG	KMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	5.05%	+2.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.09%	11.71%	+2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.78%	14.88%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.37%	16.99%	+3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.59%	16.99%	+3.60%

IMCG vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMCG vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than KMID's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.78%	0.78%	0.85%	0.91%	0.41%	0.09%	0.30%	0.35%	0.45%	0.52%	0.38%
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF	0.12%	0.06%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCG and KMID in my portfolio?

IMCG and KMID have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMCG or KMID?

IMCG has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to KMID (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs KMID's -18.89%.

Which ETF is better, IMCG or KMID?

On 1-year performance, IMCG leads with 23.77% vs -0.30% for KMID. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, KMID has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMCG or KMID?

Over the 1-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 23.77% return vs -0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMCG or KMID?

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMCG or KMID?

IMCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.12% for KMID.

What is the main difference between IMCG and KMID?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCG and 0.80% for KMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.