PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCG vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.


IMCG

1D
0.83%
1M
4.95%
YTD
18.63%
6M
17.29%
1Y
21.82%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
14.48%

AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
5.96%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
40.08%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
18.63%6.55%18.14%20.73%-25.79%15.39%45.64%7.25%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCG and AVUV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.69

The correlation between IMCG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IMCG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCG
AVUV

Technology

30.4%
7.0%

Industrials

26.6%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
18.0%

Financial Services

9.1%
25.8%

Healthcare

7.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.5%
4.9%

Real Estate

3.4%
0.7%

Utilities

2.7%
0.1%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.8%

Energy

2.1%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
4.5%

Technology

IMCG
30.4%
AVUV
7.0%

Industrials

IMCG
26.6%
AVUV
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IMCG
10.0%
AVUV
18.0%

Financial Services

IMCG
9.1%
AVUV
25.8%

Healthcare

IMCG
7.4%
AVUV
4.2%

Basic Materials

IMCG
4.5%
AVUV
4.9%

Real Estate

IMCG
3.4%
AVUV
0.7%

Utilities

IMCG
2.7%
AVUV
0.1%

Communication Services

IMCG
2.6%
AVUV
2.8%

Energy

IMCG
2.1%
AVUV
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

IMCG
1.2%
AVUV
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCG
IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCGAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

5.06

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

15.09

-6.86

IMCG vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCG and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCGAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-49.42%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-7.95%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.92%

-28.79%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.08%

-28.79%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

0.00%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-7.91%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.67%

-0.01%

Volatility

IMCG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.53%. This indicates that IMCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCGAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

4.53%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

11.34%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

17.63%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

22.75%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

28.26%

-7.68%

IMCG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than AVUV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMCG
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.78%0.78%0.85%0.91%0.41%0.09%0.30%0.35%0.45%0.52%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCG and AVUV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMCG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs 7.95% for IMCG. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.66% for IMCG.

IMCG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCG and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCG and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer