IMCG vs. AVUV
IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. IMCG is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMCG returned 7.95%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for AVUV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IMCG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
IMCG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCG achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.
IMCG
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 21.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 22.73%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 40.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
IMCG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 18.63% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% | 15.39% | 45.64% | 7.25% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 22.73% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCG and AVUV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IMCG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMCG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCG
AVUV
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
IMCG
AVUV
Industrials
IMCG
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
IMCG
AVUV
Financial Services
IMCG
AVUV
Healthcare
IMCG
AVUV
Basic Materials
IMCG
AVUV
Real Estate
IMCG
AVUV
Utilities
IMCG
AVUV
Communication Services
IMCG
AVUV
Energy
IMCG
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
IMCG
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
IMCG
AVUV
IMCG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMCG | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 5.06 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 15.09 | -6.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMCG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCG drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCG and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCG | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.96% | -49.42% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -7.95% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.92% | -28.79% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.08% | -28.79% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | 0.00% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -7.91% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.67% | -0.01% |
Volatility
IMCG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.53%. This indicates that IMCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCG | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 4.53% | +2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 11.34% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 17.63% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 22.75% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 28.26% | -7.68% |
IMCG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IMCG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
IMCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than AVUV's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.66% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMCG and AVUV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMCG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCG dropped -58.96% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs 7.95% for IMCG. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.66% for IMCG.
IMCG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCG and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCG and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer