IMCDX vs. EEIIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) and EEIIX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IMCDX charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EEIIX.

Performance

IMCDX vs. EEIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EEIIX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: 5.16%
• 1Y: 16.48%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCDX vs. EEIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%
EEIIX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I	3.56%	26.00%	-0.97%	13.95%	-11.53%	-7.57%	5.00%	23.01%	-8.11%	16.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCDX and EEIIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2012	0.42

The correlation between IMCDX and EEIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IMCDX vs. EEIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIIX

EEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 58
EEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
EEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCDX vs. EEIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMCDX	EEIIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.42	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCDX	EEIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.11%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.16%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.70%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IMCDX	EEIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.16%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	8.07%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	8.38%	—

IMCDX vs. EEIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCDX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EEIIX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMCDX vs. EEIIX - Dividend Comparison

IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEIIX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I	10.29%	10.36%	11.46%	11.62%	13.71%	11.49%	10.06%	13.31%	10.80%	9.04%	11.27%	12.21%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCDX and EEIIX in my portfolio?

IMCDX and EEIIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.