EEIIX vs. LCCMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EEIIX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I) and LCCMX (Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - EEIIX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while LCCMX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by LEADER. Over the past 10 years, EEIIX returned 5.36%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for LCCMX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EEIIX charges 1.01%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for LCCMX.

Performance

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEIIX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than LCCMX's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EEIIX has outperformed LCCMX with an annualized return of 5.36%, while LCCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.27% annualized return.

EEIIX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 4.44%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 17.13%
• 3Y*: 10.50%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

LCCMX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 4.66%
• 1Y: 11.06%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 4.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEIIX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I	4.44%	26.00%	-0.97%	13.95%	-11.53%	-7.57%	5.00%	23.01%	-8.11%	16.45%
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	3.89%	9.73%	18.51%	13.73%	-13.30%	1.30%	7.52%	0.65%	2.35%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EEIIX and LCCMX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2009	0.23

The correlation between EEIIX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EEIIX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIIX

EEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
EEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
EEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

LCCMX

LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEIIX	LCCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.45	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	5.35	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	2.00	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.96	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	10.43	-2.06

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the LCCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEIIX and LCCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEIIX drawdown since its inception was -31.11%, which is greater than LCCMX's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEIIX and LCCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEIIX	LCCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.11%	-24.57%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.20%	-3.76%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.28%	-3.76%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.70%	-19.20%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.05%	-24.57%	-3.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-0.24%	-1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.68%	-2.79%	-5.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.06%	+0.95%

Volatility

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) at 0.62%. This indicates that EEIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEIIX	LCCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.11%	0.62%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.34%	3.37%	+2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.36%	4.53%	+2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.08%	5.79%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.36%	6.34%	+2.02%

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEIIX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison

EEIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%, more than LCCMX's 8.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEIIX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I	10.20%	10.36%	11.46%	11.62%	13.71%	11.49%	10.06%	13.31%	10.80%	9.04%	11.27%	12.21%
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	8.53%	8.93%	10.39%	8.55%	5.68%	2.11%	2.11%	2.98%	2.89%	2.10%	2.01%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEIIX and LCCMX in my portfolio?

EEIIX and LCCMX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEIIX or LCCMX?

EEIIX has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to LCCMX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEIIX dropped -31.11% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.