PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCDX vs. DBELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IMCDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBELX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.67%
YTD
2.50%
6M
3.44%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%6.44%8.51%-13.79%0.08%8.35%4.27%
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
2.50%20.86%-4.37%12.50%-6.99%-9.37%2.61%0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCDX and DBELX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCDX vs. DBELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCDX

DBELX
DBELX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMCDXDBELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

Drawdowns

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCDXDBELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

Volatility

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCDXDBELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.45%

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCDX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DBELX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

IMCDX vs. DBELX - Dividend Comparison

IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
4.92%4.41%3.80%2.03%2.01%1.98%1.17%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMCDX
Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund
0.00%0.00%4.08%4.21%3.80%6.14%4.64%4.99%5.30%4.79%5.22%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCDX and DBELX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCDX and DBELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer