IMCB vs. SCHO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IMCB is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index, while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IMCB returned 11.18%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for SCHO. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. IMCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.

Performance

IMCB vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCB achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCB has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 11.18%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.

IMCB

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: 12.99%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 20.86%
• 3Y*: 16.89%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: 11.18%

SCHO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: 3.43%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 1.78%
• 10Y*: 1.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMCB vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	12.99%	10.25%	15.10%	16.37%	-16.09%	22.81%	13.35%	31.49%	-11.53%	19.70%
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	0.33%	5.49%	3.65%	4.31%	-3.87%	-0.64%	3.11%	3.47%	1.37%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCB and SCHO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010	-0.11

The correlation between IMCB and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IMCB vs. SCHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IMCB	SCHO
Technology	21.8%	1.1%
Industrials	19.1%	-
Financial Services	11.7%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	-
Healthcare	7.9%	-
Energy	7.0%	-
Utilities	6.1%	-
Basic Materials	5.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	-
Real Estate	4.2%	-
Communication Services	2.3%	1.1%

Return for Risk

IMCB vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMCB

IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 55
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 50
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SCHO

SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 87
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMCB vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMCB	SCHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	2.52	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	4.11	-1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.51	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	4.01	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.27	17.08	-6.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IMCB vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCB and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMCB	SCHO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	2.52	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.90	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	1.09	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.99	-0.49

Drawdowns

IMCB vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCB drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCB and SCHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMCB	SCHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.80%	-5.69%	-53.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.05%	-0.86%	-7.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.80%	-0.98%	-18.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.15%	-5.69%	-19.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.99%	-5.69%	-35.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.19%	-0.35%	-1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-0.61%	-7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	0.20%	+1.84%

Volatility

IMCB vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.44%. This indicates that IMCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IMCB	SCHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	0.44%	+3.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	0.93%	+8.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.96%	1.37%	+11.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	1.98%	+15.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.67%	1.56%	+18.11%

IMCB vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IMCB vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

IMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than SCHO's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.23%	1.42%	1.43%	1.55%	1.70%	1.08%	1.12%	1.32%	1.80%	1.31%	1.79%	1.47%
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	3.91%	4.06%	4.29%	3.76%	1.34%	0.41%	1.27%	2.27%	1.60%	1.12%	0.82%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IMCB and SCHO in my portfolio?

IMCB and SCHO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IMCB or SCHO?

IMCB has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to SCHO (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCB dropped -58.80% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

Which ETF is better, IMCB or SCHO?

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.18% vs 1.69% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IMCB or SCHO?

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMCB or SCHO?

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IMCB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMCB or SCHO?

SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.23% for IMCB.

What is the main difference between IMCB and SCHO?

IMCB is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHO is Government Bonds. IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IMCB and 0.03% for SCHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.