IMCB vs. PEXL
IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IMCB returned 9.00%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IMCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
IMCB vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMCB achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 22.42% return.
IMCB
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 15.90%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
PEXL
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 22.42%
- 6M
- 25.49%
- 1Y
- 55.27%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- —
IMCB vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 15.00% | 10.25% | 15.10% | 16.37% | -16.09% | 22.81% | 13.35% | 31.49% | -12.77% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 22.42% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCB and PEXL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IMCB and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IMCB vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IMCB
PEXL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Technology
IMCB
PEXL
Industrials
IMCB
PEXL
Financial Services
IMCB
PEXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
IMCB
PEXL
Healthcare
IMCB
PEXL
Energy
IMCB
PEXL
Utilities
IMCB
PEXL
-
Basic Materials
IMCB
PEXL
Consumer Defensive
IMCB
PEXL
Real Estate
IMCB
PEXL
-
Communication Services
IMCB
PEXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMCB vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
IMCB
PEXL
IMCB vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IMCB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 3.12 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 4.07 | -1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.52 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.85 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 20.93 | -8.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IMCB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 3.12 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.62 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IMCB vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCB drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCB and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMCB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -36.76% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -11.43% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -24.72% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -30.44% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -6.72% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.65% | -0.62% |
Volatility
IMCB vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) is 3.37%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that IMCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMCB | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 5.44% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 13.10% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 17.80% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 21.86% | -4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 24.05% | -4.40% |
IMCB vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IMCB vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
IMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than PEXL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.34% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IMCB and PEXL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to IMCB (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCB dropped -58.80% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.39% vs 9.00% for IMCB. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.39% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.
IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.34% for PEXL.
IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IMCB and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMCB and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer