PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IESE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAE.AS achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than IESE.AS's 6.26% return. Over the past 10 years, IMAE.AS has outperformed IESE.AS with an annualized return of 9.14%, while IESE.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.


IMAE.AS

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.95%
YTD
6.95%
6M
9.74%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.14%

IESE.AS

1D
-0.98%
1M
4.02%
YTD
6.26%
6M
8.13%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMAE.AS
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.95%19.74%8.89%15.99%-9.31%25.66%-3.06%25.45%-9.65%10.15%
IESE.AS
iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.26%2.40%6.46%16.38%-14.87%27.26%3.74%29.04%-6.71%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAE.AS and IESE.AS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2011

0.86

The correlation between IMAE.AS and IESE.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAE.AS
IMAE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IESE.AS
IESE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IESE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IESE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IESE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMAE.ASIESE.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.08

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.54

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

1.41

+4.78

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the IESE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAE.AS and IESE.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMAE.ASIESE.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.40

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.35

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.50

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.50

+0.03

Drawdowns

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAE.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, which is greater than IESE.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAE.AS and IESE.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMAE.ASIESE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.60%

-33.34%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-10.05%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-15.79%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-23.66%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.60%

-33.34%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-1.88%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-6.13%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.84%

-1.28%

Volatility

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IESE.AS) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMAE.ASIESE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.74%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

10.86%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

13.40%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

14.49%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.29%

+0.25%

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMAE.AS and IESE.AS have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMAE.AS vs. IESE.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAE.AS nor IESE.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IMAE.AS and IESE.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMAE.AS and IESE.AS have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMAE.AS and IESE.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer