PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMAE.AS is traded in EUR, while IEFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IEFV.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAE.AS achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than IEFV.L's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IMAE.AS has underperformed IEFV.L with an annualized return of 9.14%, while IEFV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.


IMAE.AS

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.95%
YTD
6.95%
6M
9.74%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.14%

IEFV.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.92%
YTD
13.72%
6M
17.82%
1Y
33.08%
3Y*
21.41%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMAE.AS
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.95%19.74%8.89%15.99%-9.31%25.66%-3.06%25.45%-9.65%10.15%
IEFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
13.72%34.79%10.49%13.77%-3.76%26.29%-8.97%23.07%-13.74%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAE.AS and IEFV.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.87

The correlation between IMAE.AS and IEFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAE.AS
IMAE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFV.L
IEFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMAE.ASIEFV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

3.35

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

12.37

-6.17

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the IEFV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAE.AS and IEFV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMAE.ASIEFV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.42

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.94

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.61

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.49

+0.04

Drawdowns

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAE.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, smaller than the maximum IEFV.L drawdown of -40.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAE.AS and IEFV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMAE.ASIEFV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.60%

-40.78%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-9.82%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-16.66%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-19.43%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.60%

-40.78%

+5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-0.97%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-7.52%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.67%

-0.11%

Volatility

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) at 4.45%. This indicates that IMAE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMAE.ASIEFV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.45%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

10.78%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

13.61%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

15.44%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

17.61%

-2.07%

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMAE.AS vs. IEFV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAE.AS nor IEFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMAE.AS and IEFV.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IMAE.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IMAE.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.

IMAE.AS tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IMAE.AS and 0.25% for IEFV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMAE.AS and IEFV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer