PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (ESPX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IMAE.AS is traded in EUR, while ESPX.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESPX.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMAE.AS achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than ESPX.AS's 10.56% return.


IMAE.AS

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.95%
YTD
6.95%
6M
9.74%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.14%

ESPX.AS

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.53%
YTD
10.56%
6M
11.16%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IMAE.AS
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.95%19.74%8.89%15.99%-1.66%
ESPX.AS
iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.56%4.27%33.07%24.45%-11.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IMAE.AS and ESPX.AS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022

0.55

The correlation between IMAE.AS and ESPX.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAE.AS
IMAE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ESPX.AS
ESPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) and iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (ESPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMAE.ASESPX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

4.00

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

14.69

-8.50

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMAE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the ESPX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMAE.AS and ESPX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMAE.ASESPX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.27

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.95

-0.42

Drawdowns

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAE.AS drawdown since its inception was -35.60%, which is greater than ESPX.AS's maximum drawdown of -22.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAE.AS and ESPX.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMAE.ASESPX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.60%

-22.93%

-12.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-6.92%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-22.93%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-0.57%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-4.76%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.90%

+0.66%

Volatility

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IMAE.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to iShares S&P 500 Scored and Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (ESPX.AS) at 3.18%. This indicates that IMAE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMAE.ASESPX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

3.18%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

8.60%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

12.27%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.15%

15.46%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.46%

+0.08%

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMAE.AS vs. ESPX.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAE.AS nor ESPX.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IMAE.AS and ESPX.AS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IMAE.AS.

IMAE.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while ESPX.AS is S&P 500. IMAE.AS tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ESPX.AS tracks S&P 500 ESG Index Net (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IMAE.AS and 0.07% for ESPX.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMAE.AS and ESPX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer