ILTB vs. FBND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND).
ILTB and FBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ILTB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD). It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. FBND is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014.
Performance
ILTB vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILTB vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | -0.57% | 7.22% | -3.00% | 8.04% | -26.62% | -2.67% | 16.10% | 19.61% | -5.10% | 11.24% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.12% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILTB achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ILTB has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.54%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.78% annualized return.
ILTB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 1.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.64%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
FBND
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILTB vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILTB vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
ILTB
FBND
ILTB vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.03 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.41 | 1.44 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.18 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 1.69 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 5.25 | -4.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.03 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.17 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.46 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.44 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILTB and FBND is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ILTB vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
ILTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than FBND's 4.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 4.94% | 4.83% | 4.91% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 3.45% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 3.99% | 4.20% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.73% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
ILTB vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILTB drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILTB and FBND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.88% | -17.25% | -19.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -2.79% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.22% | -17.25% | -17.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | -17.25% | -19.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.96% | -1.80% | -20.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -3.38% | -6.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 0.90% | +1.52% |
Volatility
ILTB vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.66%. This indicates that ILTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILTB | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 1.66% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 2.62% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 4.44% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 5.90% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 6.08% | +5.47% |