ILOW vs. IDOG
ILOW (AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF) and IDOG (ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ILOW is actively managed, while IDOG is passively managed. Over the past year, ILOW returned 11.03% vs 35.52% for IDOG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
ILOW vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILOW achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 14.02% return.
ILOW
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDOG
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 35.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
ILOW vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ILOW AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF | 4.82% | 26.99% | -1.37% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.02% | 39.94% | -3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ILOW and IDOG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between ILOW and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
ILOW vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ILOW
IDOG
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ILOW
IDOG
Industrials
ILOW
IDOG
Consumer Defensive
ILOW
IDOG
Technology
ILOW
IDOG
Healthcare
ILOW
IDOG
Communication Services
ILOW
IDOG
Utilities
ILOW
IDOG
Energy
ILOW
IDOG
Real Estate
ILOW
IDOG
-
Consumer Cyclical
ILOW
IDOG
Basic Materials
ILOW
IDOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ILOW vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
ILOW
IDOG
ILOW vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILOW | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 5.51 | -4.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 19.31 | -14.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILOW | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.68 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.51 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
ILOW vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILOW drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILOW and IDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILOW | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -37.32% | +26.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -6.47% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -0.47% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -7.93% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.84% | +0.67% |
Volatility
ILOW vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.13%. This indicates that ILOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ILOW | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.13% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 10.09% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 13.33% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 15.61% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 17.45% | -2.89% |
ILOW vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ILOW and IDOG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
ILOW vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
ILOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than IDOG's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.42% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
ILOW AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF | 1.53% | 1.60% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ILOW and IDOG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILOW has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILOW dropped -10.37% vs IDOG's -37.32%.
On 1-year performance, IDOG leads with 35.52% vs 11.03% for ILOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 35.52% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILOW and IDOG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.53% for ILOW.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and SS&C.
IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ILOW and IDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer