PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILOW vs. HIDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILOW vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILOW achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly lower than HIDV's 10.96% return.


ILOW

1D
-0.80%
1M
1.39%
YTD
4.82%
6M
6.86%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIDV

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.84%
YTD
10.96%
6M
11.82%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILOW vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ILOW
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
4.82%26.99%-1.37%
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
10.96%14.64%4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ILOW and HIDV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2024

0.65

The correlation between ILOW and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILOW vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILOW
ILOW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ILOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILOW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ILOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILOW Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

HIDV
HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILOW vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILOWHIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.44

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.99

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

13.04

-8.64

ILOW vs. HIDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the HIDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILOW and HIDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILOWHIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.41

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.62

-0.55

Drawdowns

ILOW vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILOW drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILOW and HIDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILOWHIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-18.76%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-9.57%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.95%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-2.05%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.19%

+0.32%

Volatility

ILOW vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison

AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) at 2.98%. This indicates that ILOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILOWHIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

2.98%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

9.02%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

11.91%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

14.52%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

14.52%

+0.04%

ILOW vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILOW vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison

ILOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than HIDV's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.27%2.22%2.29%2.23%
ILOW
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
1.53%1.60%0.78%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILOW and HIDV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILOW has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to HIDV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILOW dropped -10.37% vs HIDV's -18.76%.

On 1-year performance, HIDV leads with 28.51% vs 11.03% for ILOW. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 28.51% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ILOW.

HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.53% for ILOW.

ILOW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ILOW and 0.45% for HIDV.

HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILOW and HIDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer