PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILOW vs. EYEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ILOW vs. EYEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) and AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILOW achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than EYEG's 0.47% return.


ILOW

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
6.27%
6M
6.39%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EYEG

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.69%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILOW vs. EYEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ILOW
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
6.27%26.99%-1.53%
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
0.47%7.42%0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ILOW and EYEG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024

0.39

The correlation between ILOW and EYEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ILOW vs. EYEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILOW
ILOW Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ILOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILOW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ILOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILOW Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

EYEG
EYEG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EYEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYEG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EYEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYEG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILOW vs. EYEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) and AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ILOWEYEGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.76

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.46

5.06

+0.41

ILOW vs. EYEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the EYEG Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILOW and EYEG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ILOW vs. EYEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILOW drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, which is greater than EYEG's maximum drawdown of -4.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILOW and EYEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ILOWEYEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-4.66%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-2.84%

-6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.85%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-1.24%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

0.99%

+1.53%

Volatility

ILOW vs. EYEG - Volatility Comparison

AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) at 1.13%. This indicates that ILOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EYEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ILOWEYEGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

1.13%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

3.25%

+8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

4.32%

+9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

5.45%

+9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.55%

5.45%

+9.10%

ILOW vs. EYEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EYEG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ILOW vs. EYEG - Dividend Comparison

ILOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than EYEG's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
4.93%4.94%6.07%0.25%
ILOW
AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF
1.51%1.60%0.78%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ILOW and EYEG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILOW has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to EYEG (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ILOW dropped -10.37% vs EYEG's -4.66%.

On 1-year performance, ILOW leads with 13.72% vs 4.98% for EYEG. On fees, EYEG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EYEG has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ILOW has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EYEG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ILOW.

EYEG has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 1.51% for ILOW.

ILOW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EYEG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ILOW and 0.30% for EYEG.

EYEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ILOW and EYEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer