PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ILIT vs. SETM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ILIT vs. SETM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ILIT vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
10.28%81.51%-45.14%-28.86%
SETM
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
14.27%95.27%-13.24%4.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ILIT achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than SETM's 14.27% return.


ILIT

1D
1.54%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
10.28%
6M
45.10%
1Y
117.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SETM

1D
5.82%
1M
-14.37%
YTD
14.27%
6M
33.70%
1Y
137.98%
3Y*
26.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ILIT vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILIT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ILIT vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ILIT
ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SETM
SETM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILIT vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ILITSETMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.37

3.03

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

3.18

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

5.08

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.48

17.14

-3.66

ILIT vs. SETM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ILIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the SETM Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ILIT and SETM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ILITSETMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

3.03

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.52

-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between ILIT and SETM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ILIT vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison

ILIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than SETM's 1.37% yield.


TTM202520242023
ILIT
Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF
2.06%2.27%6.48%0.69%
SETM
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
1.37%1.56%2.07%2.47%

Drawdowns

ILIT vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ILIT drawdown since its inception was -73.69%, which is greater than SETM's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILIT and SETM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ILITSETMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.69%

-42.81%

-30.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.86%

-25.85%

+2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.85%

-16.74%

-11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.87%

-14.59%

-33.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

7.67%

+0.55%

Volatility

ILIT vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) is 15.03%, while Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 18.23%. This indicates that ILIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ILITSETMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.03%

18.23%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.65%

36.72%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.81%

45.92%

+3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.40%

36.22%

+5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.40%

36.22%

+5.18%