ILGCX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
ILGCX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on May 27, 2014. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
ILGCX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ILGCX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | -8.30% | 14.93% | 31.88% | 41.54% | -20.15% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -23.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ILGCX achieves a -8.30% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
ILGCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -8.30%
- 6M
- -6.63%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ILGCX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ILGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ILGCX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
ILGCX
SWLGX
ILGCX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ILGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.72 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 2.51 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ILGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.66 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.68 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between ILGCX and SWLGX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ILGCX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
ILGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 151.73%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | 151.73% | 38.35% | 13.20% | 0.02% | 33.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% |
Drawdowns
ILGCX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ILGCX drawdown since its inception was -25.89%, smaller than the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ILGCX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ILGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.89% | -32.69% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -16.16% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.69% | -16.16% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -7.13% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 4.62% | -0.30% |
Volatility
ILGCX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) is 4.06%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that ILGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ILGCX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 5.38% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.36% | 11.82% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 22.31% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 21.47% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 22.78% | -1.20% |