ILGCX vs. PWB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ILGCX (Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A) and PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ILGCX is actively managed, while PWB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ILGCX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PWB.

Performance

ILGCX vs. PWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ILGCX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWB

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 10.94%
• YTD: 28.68%
• 6M: 28.89%
• 1Y: 45.84%
• 3Y*: 34.49%
• 5Y*: 18.36%
• 10Y*: 18.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ILGCX vs. PWB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	-8.30%	14.93%	31.88%	41.54%	-20.15%
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	28.68%	24.94%	31.04%	30.61%	-19.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ILGCX and PWB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022	0.90

The correlation between ILGCX and PWB shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ILGCX vs. PWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB

PWB Risk / Return Rank: 74
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ILGCX vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (ILGCX) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ILGCX	PWB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.61	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ILGCX	PWB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-52.58%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.23%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ILGCX	PWB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.47%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	20.99%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	20.71%	—

ILGCX vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ILGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

ILGCX vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison

ILGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 151.73%, while PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILGCX Columbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund Class A	151.73%	38.35%	13.20%	0.02%	33.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.37%	0.31%	0.04%	0.21%	0.58%	0.97%	0.54%	0.82%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ILGCX and PWB in my portfolio?

ILGCX and PWB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.